Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á÷Á¢ µðÁöÅ» ¹æ»ç¼± ÃÔ¿µ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú Ektaspeed ¹× Ektaspeed Plus Çʸ§À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø¿ë µðÁöÅ» ¿µ»ó½Ã½ºÅÛ°úÀÇ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM WITH FILM-BASED DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEM USING EKTASPEED AND EKTASPEED PLUS FILM

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1995³â 25±Ç 1È£ p.51 ~ 70
µµÁ¤ÁÖ, ±èÀº°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
µµÁ¤ÁÖ (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
±èÀº°æ (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

Á÷Á¢ µðÁöÅ» ¹æ»ç¼± ÃÔ¿µ½Ã½ºÅÛ Áß ÇϳªÀÎ Sens-A-Ray ½Ã½ºÅÛ (Regam Medical
Systems, Sundsvall, Sweden)À» Ektaspeed, Ektaspeed Plus Çʸ§À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø¿ë
µðÁöÅ» ¿µ»ó½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú ¿µ»óÀÇ ÈæÈ­µµ, ´ëÁ¶µµ ¹× Æǵ¶´ÉÀÇ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ºñ±³ÇÏ°í, ¼¾¼­ ³ëÀÌÁ
Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. °¢ ±º ¸ðµÎ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Æò±Õ ȸ»öµµ ¹× ÈæÈ­µµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» º¼ ¼ö
ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ³·Àº ³ëÃâ½Ã°£À» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ±º¿¡¼­ S±ºÀº E±º, EP±ºº¸´Ù Æò±Õ ȸ»öµµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù
(p<0.01).
2. S±ºÀº ³ëÃâ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¿µ»ó ´ëÁ¶µµ°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú°í, E±º, EP±ºÀº
³ëÃâ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¿µ»ó ´ëÁ¶µµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ³ôÀº ³ëÃâ½Ã°£À» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ
±º¿¡¼­ S±ºÀº E±º, EP±ºº¸´Ù ¿µ»ó ´ëÁ¶µµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù(P<0.01).
3. °¢ ±º ¸ðµÎ ÀûÀýÇÑ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£¿¡¼­ ÃÖ´ë Æǵ¶´É 1À» º¸¿´´Ù. ÃÖ´ë Æǵ¶´É 1À» º¸ÀÌ´Â ÃÖ
Àú ³ëÃâ½Ã°£Àº S±º, EP±º¿¡¼­ 0.5ÃÊ, E±º¿¡¼­ 0.6ÃÊ·Î S±º, EP±ºÀº E±ºº¸´Ù ³·Àº ³ëÃâ½Ã°£
¿¡¼­ ÃÖ´ë Æǵ¶´É 1À» º¸¿´´Ù.
4. Sens-A-Ray systemÀÇ ¼¾¼­ ³ëÀÌÁî´Â Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ³ëÃâ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â
°ÍÀ» º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¿¬±¸°á°ú·Î ¹Ì·ç¾î º¼ ¶§ Á÷Á¢ µðÁöÅÐ ¹æ»ç¼± ÃÔ¿µ½Ã½ºÅÛ Áß ÇϳªÀÎ Sens-A-Ray
½Ã½ºÅÛÀº ³Ê¹« ³·°Å³ª, ³ôÀº ³ëÃâ½Ã°£À» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ³ëÃâ½Ã°£±º¿¡¼­ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Ektaspeed,
Ektaspeed Plus Çʸ§º¸´Ù ³ôÀº ÈæÈ­µµ¿Í ´ëÁ¶µµÀÇ, µ¿µîÇÑ Æǵ¶´ÉÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â ¿µ»óÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ
¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the direct digital radiographic
system with film-based digital imaging system using Ektaspeed and Ektaspeed Plus film
with respect to image characteristics and detectability and evaluate the sensor noise
with the use of subtraction method.
Direct digital radiographic system which used was Sens-A-Ray system(Regam
Medical Systems, Sundsvall, Sweden) and film-based digital imaging system was
composed of Macintosh ¥± ci computer, high resolution Sony XC-77 CCD camera and
intraoral x-ray film(Kodak Ektaspeed film, Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film).
Images were taken by using CCD sensor of Sens-A-Ray system, Ektaspeed film and
Ektaspeed Plus film with variable exposure time(0.06s, 0.1s, 0.16s, 0.2s, 0.3s, 0.4s, 0.5s,
0.6s, 0.8s, 1.0s), 5 times at each exposure time. And then ektaspeed films and ektaspeed
plus films were digitized using CCD camera. Image groups were divided into 3 groups;
Sens-A-Ray group(direct digital radiographic system), Ektaspeed group and Ektaspeed
Plus group(film-based digital imaging system) They were assessed by the following
three aspects ; image density, image contrast and detectability and sensor noise of
Sens-A-Ray system was also evaluated.
The results were as follow :
1. S group showed higher density than E, EP group except at the low exposure
time(p<0.01).
2. S group showed higher contrast than E, EP group except at the high exposure
time(p<0.01).
3. All groups showed good detectability at the each proper exposure time. Lowest
exposure time which shows maximum detectability in S, EP group(0.5s) was lower than
that in E group(0.6s).
4. Sensor noise of Sens-A-Ray system generally increased according to exposure
time.
On the basis of the abode results, it was considered that Sens-A-Ray system could
show higher speed, higher contrast than Ektaspeed, Ektaspeed Plus film except at too
high and low exposure time and the same detectability as the conventional intraoral
film.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸